Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Haggith's avatar

I'm going to post a comment here that someone sent me by email (with his permission) because I think it makes some good points, and a few others had emailed me essentially the same response:

"I agree that Trump's approach to Canada is beyond stupid and that we should want nothing to do with them in terms of a political union. You should also mention that Canadians are also the real losers though. Imagine allowing someone like Trudeau ruin your country for a decade only to vote in the Liberal Party again. Canada has a bleak future. It's worth acknowledging that Canada is far from united. It's an extremely polarized nation. Laurentian and Maritime Canada steal from Western Canada to fund their endless welfare state and non productive government workers. Between the fissures that are rupturing between these regions along with Quebec, I don't see Canada surviving as is in the next 25 years. I'd be interested in your thoughts." --Kyle S

I agree completely with that. However, Canadians really wanted to ditch the liberals this time because of Trudeau, if you believe the polls; so I think that just shows how MUCH they despise Trump for what he is doing to them. (As do I because it is truly "deplorable.") The above points are worth making, though. As much as they wanted to ditch the Liberals, a common enemy united them around the person they believed would be most likely to fight Trump; and, from what I could see, Carney IS most likely to fight Trump but to do so with some dignity and composure. Nevertheless, to vote for a central bankster to run your government??? Yikes, but Trump pushed them between a rock and a hard place—risk the sovereignty of their country or see it slowly whittled away by Liberalism.

I also agree that Canadians are not the mild-mannered people they are credited with. They obviously have an amazing publicity agent who has convinced the entire world to believe they are the most civil people on earth. I managed a ranch that was campground to 1,000 memberships, 993 of which were Canadian-owned because the ranch sat near the border and was marketed in Canada. I never had a worse managing experience. Talk about irascible, and that was when they weren’t even drunk! My wife used to say, "They need to just crack a Kokanee and camp!" They would argue and fight in board meetings (and with me) like a cage full of tom cats. I never got worse treatment in 30 years of managing large properties.

There were, of course, nice ones, too; but there were an awful lot who just bitched and moaned about how expensive things were when they had the lowest dues of anyplace I ever managed, and then bitched that things weren't getting done when they wouldn't approve a budget to do it; then strenuously complained when you enforced their own rules on them, rules they made, and I mean even the board members who wrote the rules got angry if they were enforced on them but just as angry if they were not enforced on their neighbors often enough!

Then they complained that their grossly underpaid employees weren't doing enough. I did a deep wage study for the board for every position among the thirty staff members, and showed that most of their employees were in the bottom percentile for wages in the whole county. "This," I explained, "is why I can only hire ex-prisoners. They are the only people desperate enough to work for what you'll pay." I convinced the board to significantly increase the pay on the basis that I never was able to hire anyone there whose resume I wouldn't normally have tossed straight in the waste basket because those were the only people applying at the advertised pay, and I didn't want to waste people's time (and my own as a manager) by interviewing people who would be angry when they found out they came out to the ranch to apply for a job that offered them less than they made back in high school.

The board agreed and changed the wages, and that is when the camp became especially outraged at their dues, but we were finally able to hire decent people. However, the dissatisfied took over the board the next year and ordered me to fire nearly all the employees and start over. I told them they would never get any of the projects done if I did that. I refused because I wasn't going to go through that education process with them and be their henchman; so, they fired me. The end result was the board argued for the next two years, could never get a budget approved and never got any of their projects done throughout those two years--projects that had been slated with funds fully raised to do them using our own employees in just another month. We were just waiting for the off-season to start when hardly anyone would be on the ranch to be incovenienced.

I was glad I refused them, didn't have to go through the level of infighting they had throughout those two years (according to old board members that I occasionally ran into); and kept my dignity intact by not firing their best employees--the two who were always extremely dedicated but were most hated because they actually enforced the rules.

What a nut house!

So, I totally get it; and don't even get me started with how they run over you with their shopping carts in the local US Costco, trying to get ahead of you like the product you're reaching for is the last bargain on the shelf, or race you to a parking space you were sitting their peaceably waiting for as someone loaded their car.

That said, my heart goes out to the kind Canadians among them--and there are plenty, in spite of my experiences--who found their best option for fighting Trump was the Liberal candidate. Man! What a predicament to be shoved into; but I would place the saving of sovereignty over partisan politics in that position, too. Trump has accomplished only one thing with his Canadian trade war--the further Liberalization of all Canada.

--David

Expand full comment

No posts